Is the ‘Wisdom of the Crowd’ being destroyed by the anonymous review?
Of all the things that the internet promised, increasing transparency was in many ways the most promising. Fans of ’social media’ enthuse about how micro-blogging networks (like Twitter, Facebook etc) bring the ‘wisdom of the crowd’ to bear on big corporations and organisations – and force them to listen and change their ways.
The ‘user review’ is now an integral part of most consumer-related websites: from Amazon, to eBay, to TripAdvisor, to Plebble, to Unvarnished, to coworker.com and countless more. And if you read the statistics, it seems that the reviews we find there make a difference to what we choose to do.
The problem is that this dream is already turning sour – and for one reason: the anonymous review.
The backlash is already underway. The reputation of TripAdvisor has been sliding downhill for the last year because it cannot (or will not) take more steps to ensure the identity – and accountability – of its reviewers. The resultant misuse of the review system, as hotels attempt to gain an advantage over their competitors, has degraded trustworthiness of the site. And in the news just yesterday, we heard of the UK history Professor who admitted to faking positive reviews for his own books at Amazon (at the same time as slagging off those of his peers).
Today, I did a quick test of Plebble.com – another of those apparently well-meaning ‘consumer review’ websites. I signed up using an alternative email address and created a fake company called ‘My Imaginary Competitor‘ and then proceeded to review it – see pic above.
Plebble.com’s system picked up that I used some potentially ‘defamatory’ words, but left me to make the choice of whether or not to continue and publish – which of course, I did. But ask yourself: if I was hell-bent on damaging My Imaginary Competitor, would I care, hiding behind a hotmail address from my local Starbucks that my remarks were defamatory?
Now imagine if I’d just gone on and posted that review about YOUR company.
The first you’d know of it would be an invitation from Plebble.com to join their community. And that’s how it works – and how it’s going to be, more and more – as review sites like this use ‘user reviews’ to pull unsuspecting businesses into their worlds.
And if I had posted that review about your business, do you think Plebble.com would respond to your requests for it to be taken down without you having to resort to legal threats? I don’t know but – if TripAdvisor is anything to go by – I doubt it. Their entire business model would collapse if they gave in to pressure to remove bad reviews, it’s as simple as that.
I’ve not singled out Plebble.com for any other reason than their MD followed me on Twitter today and that reminded me they existed. I was curious to see whether or not they had put in place any controls to ensure the veracity of what their reviewers post. They clearly haven’t. In allowing anonymous reviews, they, like most (if not all) the other review sites guarantee their system will be corrupted by reviews designed to damage or gain advantage.
And before the guys at Plebble.com (or TripAdvisor for that matter) get prickly at having criticism levelled at them, they need to remember that by soliciting reviews from a businesses’s customers, they give that business no choice about whether they want to be featured or not.
Here’s the problem: while companies like Plebble put such a lack of accountability at the heart of their business model, it’s hard to imagine how they’ll ever be willing to be accountable for the consequences created by that business model.
I’m a great fan of feedback. It’s where we started out with our business – and where we’re coming back to in the work with online reputation. But feedback doesn’t work when it’s disconnected from the giver and the receiver – and that’s the mistake that the review site people continue to make. Why? Because meaningful accountability would seriously mess up the monetization process and we can’t have that, can we?
The issue of anonymous reviews is discussed in today’s Guardian here.
On the face of it, this feature is supposed to make Spotify available to you when you don’t have enough 3G bandwidth to stream it. In theory, it sounds good but in reality how long a playlist takes to download will depend on the WiFi bandwidth you have available..
At home in Devon even on a lousy 450kbs broadband, Spotify Premium streams pretty well on the laptop – with only the occasional drop-out.
On the upside, Spotify does something that’s so different from any previous mode of music ownership: it encourages me to listen to lots of new things. With Spotify, the musical world expands. With my real-world CD collection (or paid-for mp3s), it seems to contract, encouraging us to listen more and more to the same things.

Hands-free kits and me have never really got on very well. I kept buying Jabras but just couldn’t get on with them. All I can say is that I found them more trouble than they were worth.
Sadly, on or about the 18th Jan 2010 Spotify closed the back door that allowed you to create a free account without need for an invitation.





