Spotify Premium: is it worth the money?

After several months as a free Spotify user, the time has come to ask ‘Is the premium service worth it?’

As some visitors know, I’ve been a Spotify free-account user from the early days – since way, way back in December last year.  It’s turned out to be the perfect online form or radio station for me.  I’ve blogged about it enthusiastically and set up more than 400 new users from a steady stream of invites passed from Spotify HQ.

Update: Check out my review of Spotify Premium here

I describe the service in several ways: ‘the death of music ownership’; ‘iTunes as it was supposed to be’; ‘internet radio for the terminally lazy’ and so on.  What I’ve enjoyed most about Spotify is its perfect blend of ‘search’, ‘genre’ and ‘radio’ logic to create endless supplies of new experiences or sickly sweet meanderings down musical memory lane.

It’s internet usability that’s come of age – in the same way that the iPhone is the grown up version of mobile phoning.  Spotify – at present – is almost perfect.  Even the absence of the big, greedily-held catalogues (Pink Floyd, Beatles) is a plus.  Hey, I grew up gorged on that stuff.  It’s a breath of fresh air not to have it polluting the Spotify world.

But the big question is: how will Spotify monetise its service?  (Read: “will it survive so I can continue to enjoy it?”)

At present there are two models: an ad-supported free service and a £9.99 premium service.  Good news is that I’ve bought the ad-supported service 100%.  Great start Spotify, you’re more than half way there.  I’m fully on board.

Now what’s going to make me shell out the £9.99?  Err… nothing – except the desire to get rid of ads.  I don’t know about you, but I’m not hugely motivated by paying money for something to be taken away.  Unless it’s toothache or a tree in danger of falling on my house – in which case it becomes a grudge purchase.

Spotify – please take note.

The one thing that would make Spotify worth £9.99 to me is the ability to put mp3s on my iPhone / iPod.  That would fit in with my lifestyle rather than with the worries and fears of the record industry.

And that’s the crunch here.  Are the record companies ready to take the leap into the unknown?  The fact is they’re going to have to sooner or later.  The only question is whose hand are they going to be holding when they do?

From where I sit, it might as well be Spotify’s.

Facebook profiting from scam ads? You decide *yawn*

Yes, we’ll help you decide if Facebook is profiting from obvious scams through their sponsored advertising.

Here’s a question: is there a moral and/or legal problem with profiteering from scammy advertisers?

It only takes me a few seconds to establish when a particular Facebook advertiser is considered a scam by the wider internet community.

Ok, you might say, ‘buyer beware’. But at what point does (or should) Facebook be accountable for displaying these ads – and, of course, profiting from each click through?

Are we saying that Facebook isn’t accountable?

Are we saying it shouldn’t be accountable?

Well, I think it should be accountable if it profits from selling space to scammy advertisers.

So long as those ads keep appearing, I’ll keep having fun and offering a bit of balance with my cheeky profile picture (left). ;-)

And you don’t have to dig too hard to find out that all isn’t well with Facebook advertising generally.  94 pretty pissed off comments and no reply from Facebook.

KGB.com – no irony

KGB.com: ironically, a project that wants to control information

I picked this up from Google trends this morning.  ‘KGB.com‘.  I’m not sure what it’s trying to be (it really isn’t obvious).  It appears to critique the traditional search process (effectively the ‘disorganisedness’ of Google search findings).

It seems to want to offer people a way to contextualise what they find.  By putting in their space.  Right.

A space that you immediately notice is AdSense populated.

Is it a search engine?

No it is not. At kgb.com, our goal is allow you to find what information you need right on our site, rather than just direct you to other locations on the web as a normal search engine would.

Of course, they use search engines to bring this information to your space in their world.  If KGB.com is trying to give people tools to manage chaotic online information, then what are they?  My initial review didn’t detect what those tools might be.  From my initial review, KGB ends up looking like yet another walled information community (like AOL was, Facebook IS…) that can be – rather uninspiringly – capitalised with Google ads.

What’s your view?

It says you can ask it any question and get an answer.  Ok.  Here are a couple: what was the KGB in the Soviet Union and how did it control information?

Oneayearcampaign.com: read this UKBF thread first

oneayearcampaign.com puts its reputation on the line in UK Business Forum thread

I’ve long been a critic of online directory schemes promising increased business. I feel like the James Randi of the internet at times, driven to debunk people exploiting other peoples’ ignorance about online marketing. “What Google visibility?” I like to ask. “Why are your site visitors going to come to my site?” I’m partial to enquiring.

One project I wanted to fire these questions at is oneayearcampaign.com – a site that aims to take 10% in exchange for new business it creates for you. Why would you pay to advertise with this untested website? Because the owner claims she will give 10% of her earnings to ‘her favourite charities’.  At first glance, it’s appears to be a sweet idea.

Siobhan Jones of oneayearcampaign.com posted in UKBF offering free advertising to the first 30 UKBF members. The first few people thought it was a nice idea. Then along came Ling with a few tricky questions of her own resulting in this monster of a thread - and a masterpiece of online reputation (mis?)management for all involved.

This thread is so revealing I wouldn’t be surprised if they deleted it soon – so hurry up, put the kettle on and get comfortable; this is worth an hour of your life. You might learn how not to do a lot of things. Your business may even thank you for it.

Findex.co.uk | oneEntry.net – good, bad or just plain evil?

Automatic listing in Findex.co.uk and oneEntry.net: good thing / bad thing?

What’s your view – leave a voicemail on 01752 548771 and we’ll feature it on The Mu Show.

We’d be interested to know your views.

One issue is that you and I have no control over the initial, automatic listing these people construct (by scraping your website).

If you don’t like it, you’re encouraged to invest your time changing it. Interesting strategy but not one that motivates me.  Because I’m highly critical of the value of online directories, I’m more likely to want to get the listing removed.  But that’s me.

How about you?  Do you think the benefits outweigh the… er… what’s the opposite of a benefit, btw? You know what I mean. Let us know what you think on 01752 548771. And if you’re Findex.co.uk or oneEntry.net we’d be happy to hear from you too.