<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for UK online reputation management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk</link>
	<description>** Theme reconstruction / tweaking in progress **</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on European Trade Register: scam or not? You (as usual) decide&#8230; by Sam Deeks</title>
		<link>http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/european-trade-register-scam-usual-decide/#comment-9098</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Deeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/?p=4149#comment-9098</guid>
		<description>HI Geoffrey, no problem. 

Try to imagine this: these scammers can&#039;t do anything to you because they&#039;re definitely outside of the normal, decent legal processes in your country. Equally, you can&#039;t do anything to them because they&#039;re outside of .... .etc. By all means, report them to the police in your region. Just don&#039;t expect anything to happen. 

Remember that YOU have the single best weapon against them: not paying and not communicating with them. I&#039;d say focus on doing that and enjoy the satisfaction of knowing that YOUR money didn&#039;t go their way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Geoffrey, no problem. </p>
<p>Try to imagine this: these scammers can&#8217;t do anything to you because they&#8217;re definitely outside of the normal, decent legal processes in your country. Equally, you can&#8217;t do anything to them because they&#8217;re outside of &#8230;. .etc. By all means, report them to the police in your region. Just don&#8217;t expect anything to happen. </p>
<p>Remember that YOU have the single best weapon against them: not paying and not communicating with them. I&#8217;d say focus on doing that and enjoy the satisfaction of knowing that YOUR money didn&#8217;t go their way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on European Trade Register: scam or not? You (as usual) decide&#8230; by Geoffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/european-trade-register-scam-usual-decide/#comment-9097</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/?p=4149#comment-9097</guid>
		<description>hello Sam,

Thanks for this extremely instructive page.
We&#039;ve fallen in the trap as well, stupidely I must admit.
Just a question, is it worth filing a complaint at police against them ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello Sam,</p>
<p>Thanks for this extremely instructive page.<br />
We&#8217;ve fallen in the trap as well, stupidely I must admit.<br />
Just a question, is it worth filing a complaint at police against them ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to complain&#8230;. about PayPal or eBay? by James Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/complain-paypal-ebay/#comment-9096</link>
		<dc:creator>James Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 15:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/?p=3393#comment-9096</guid>
		<description>Paypal have stole over $1200 from me I can not get a reasonable answer from them only automated answers..They have destroyed my online academic writing job..I live in the philippines ,so I cant access landline and their ridiculous answering service makes it impossible to use a mobile. I have spent 3000 peso trying. I am so mad and frustrated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paypal have stole over $1200 from me I can not get a reasonable answer from them only automated answers..They have destroyed my online academic writing job..I live in the philippines ,so I cant access landline and their ridiculous answering service makes it impossible to use a mobile. I have spent 3000 peso trying. I am so mad and frustrated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to complain&#8230;. about PayPal or eBay? by david bennie</title>
		<link>http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/complain-paypal-ebay/#comment-9095</link>
		<dc:creator>david bennie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/?p=3393#comment-9095</guid>
		<description>Bob,
This is my full time business.
If you buy something on Ebay as a buy it now, you have 7 days to return the goods regardless of whether it worked or not, this is your legal right under the distance selling rules.
If the item turns out to be faulty as yours has, you have 45 days to open a case.
All you have to do is provide Ebay with a tracking number via royal mail and you will receive a full refund.
If the tablet was new, then it will be covered under the manufacturer warranty also.
I cannot see how you are not getting anywhere as all cases that are opened against me by scammers are  settled in their favour, whether the refund comes from me or Ebay.
I agree with Sam, I have no control whatsoever over what is essentially my money.
I have had another case opened against me today.
I sold an air cooler/air humidifier.
It was clearly described and photographed (It was brand new)
The buyer (after a couple of weeks) said he had bought it in error as he thought it was a dehumidifier.
I refused a return as it had been unpackaged, used and was correctly described.
What did the buyer do?
Opened a case claiming the goods were not new, not as described and were the wrong item.
Even though he admits it was his mistake via messages in Ebay and he is now lying, all he has to do is send the goods back, provide a royal mail tracking number and he will be issued a full refund at my expense.
Happy days!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,<br />
This is my full time business.<br />
If you buy something on Ebay as a buy it now, you have 7 days to return the goods regardless of whether it worked or not, this is your legal right under the distance selling rules.<br />
If the item turns out to be faulty as yours has, you have 45 days to open a case.<br />
All you have to do is provide Ebay with a tracking number via royal mail and you will receive a full refund.<br />
If the tablet was new, then it will be covered under the manufacturer warranty also.<br />
I cannot see how you are not getting anywhere as all cases that are opened against me by scammers are  settled in their favour, whether the refund comes from me or Ebay.<br />
I agree with Sam, I have no control whatsoever over what is essentially my money.<br />
I have had another case opened against me today.<br />
I sold an air cooler/air humidifier.<br />
It was clearly described and photographed (It was brand new)<br />
The buyer (after a couple of weeks) said he had bought it in error as he thought it was a dehumidifier.<br />
I refused a return as it had been unpackaged, used and was correctly described.<br />
What did the buyer do?<br />
Opened a case claiming the goods were not new, not as described and were the wrong item.<br />
Even though he admits it was his mistake via messages in Ebay and he is now lying, all he has to do is send the goods back, provide a royal mail tracking number and he will be issued a full refund at my expense.<br />
Happy days!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on International credit assessment agency / ICAA Cyprus by HC</title>
		<link>http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/international-credit-assessment-agency-icaa-cyprus/#comment-9094</link>
		<dc:creator>HC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/?p=3750#comment-9094</guid>
		<description>Hi, my case started in 2010 &amp; right fm the first letter they sent to me I felt its a scam &amp; now comes this ICAA.  My advice is just ignore them don&#039;t speak to them &amp; never never reply their emails or letters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, my case started in 2010 &amp; right fm the first letter they sent to me I felt its a scam &amp; now comes this ICAA.  My advice is just ignore them don&#8217;t speak to them &amp; never never reply their emails or letters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to complain&#8230;. about PayPal or eBay? by Sam Deeks</title>
		<link>http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/complain-paypal-ebay/#comment-9093</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Deeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/?p=3393#comment-9093</guid>
		<description>Agreed, Bob. The way it looks to me is that Paypal don&#039;t mind who ends up with the pile of bricks so long as they and eBay can take the commission and - preferably - hold on to as much money in their account for as long as possible before giving it back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, Bob. The way it looks to me is that Paypal don&#8217;t mind who ends up with the pile of bricks so long as they and eBay can take the commission and &#8211; preferably &#8211; hold on to as much money in their account for as long as possible before giving it back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to complain&#8230;. about PayPal or eBay? by Bob Mason</title>
		<link>http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/complain-paypal-ebay/#comment-9092</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/?p=3393#comment-9092</guid>
		<description>It’s not sellers that get rip off there is also the buyers. I bought a tablet pc and it arrived and it worked for about two hours. I’ve been trying to get my money back for about 3 months now and I’ve now had enough of the EBay and PayPal so call safe way of buying thing over the internet. I’ve now decided to put it down to experience and have at least got a good paper weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not sellers that get rip off there is also the buyers. I bought a tablet pc and it arrived and it worked for about two hours. I’ve been trying to get my money back for about 3 months now and I’ve now had enough of the EBay and PayPal so call safe way of buying thing over the internet. I’ve now decided to put it down to experience and have at least got a good paper weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sky customer service 0844 rip-off by sky15years</title>
		<link>http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/sky-customer-service-0844-ripoff/#comment-9091</link>
		<dc:creator>sky15years</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/?p=1520#comment-9091</guid>
		<description>Sky do give conflicing information on the phone, one person states one thing , someone states something else. They are not really rude but often the same issue that has been resolved comes back to haunt customers.

If you have a genuine complaint, e-mail them with basic but accurate detail outling the exact issue. Let them know you are not satisfied until the complaint is resolve properly as the this will mean the complaint is &#039;open&#039;.

It seems to me they have too many customers too many products and not enough well trained staff to deal with the load when things go wrong.

I have never bothered with anything but their TV service for 15+ years now. 

With their engineers, you have to explain the problem in a basic fashion, i do however know how to install dishes and boxes to a professional level, but it is hard for a non tech person to cope with all the tech side of things when it goes wrong.

However, if you persist, they can give decent offers if a complaint is upheld or you want to leave, just keep on at them.

If you have a tech issue with tv, they want £65 to look at it, it just if you dont really know tech, you will be out of pocket.

Email is the only way they listen not phone calls and why people do not use saynoto0870.com is beyond me, i have never paid to call them and never will.

Their tv products are the best for uk as the pvr funtions and channel selection out perform virgin, bt vision waste of time.

In the old days their tv pack would be  a simple single feed box, now their is multroom and hd and sky + and anytime + so the more they deal with the more complicated it becomes. I could go on but I wont.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sky do give conflicing information on the phone, one person states one thing , someone states something else. They are not really rude but often the same issue that has been resolved comes back to haunt customers.</p>
<p>If you have a genuine complaint, e-mail them with basic but accurate detail outling the exact issue. Let them know you are not satisfied until the complaint is resolve properly as the this will mean the complaint is &#8216;open&#8217;.</p>
<p>It seems to me they have too many customers too many products and not enough well trained staff to deal with the load when things go wrong.</p>
<p>I have never bothered with anything but their TV service for 15+ years now. </p>
<p>With their engineers, you have to explain the problem in a basic fashion, i do however know how to install dishes and boxes to a professional level, but it is hard for a non tech person to cope with all the tech side of things when it goes wrong.</p>
<p>However, if you persist, they can give decent offers if a complaint is upheld or you want to leave, just keep on at them.</p>
<p>If you have a tech issue with tv, they want £65 to look at it, it just if you dont really know tech, you will be out of pocket.</p>
<p>Email is the only way they listen not phone calls and why people do not use saynoto0870.com is beyond me, i have never paid to call them and never will.</p>
<p>Their tv products are the best for uk as the pvr funtions and channel selection out perform virgin, bt vision waste of time.</p>
<p>In the old days their tv pack would be  a simple single feed box, now their is multroom and hd and sky + and anytime + so the more they deal with the more complicated it becomes. I could go on but I wont.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community Awards Register: Scam or not? by Sam Deeks</title>
		<link>http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/community-awards-register-scam/#comment-9090</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Deeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/?p=3002#comment-9090</guid>
		<description>Also readers might be interested to read:



&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Wendy Ruck and John Gommes

It was with great sadness that during the period executive director, Wendy Ruck, and non-executive director, John Gommes, both passed away. Both Wendy and John had made huge contributions to the development and success of the Group and will be sorely missed.

Wendy Ruck passed away suddenly in April 2011. Wendy was a director of the Group since its formation in 2004. She was responsible for recruitment and training for the Group as well as directing prize fulfilment operations in Ross on Wye. She was incredibly well liked and respected by all who knew and met her and she will be remembered not only for her professionalism, but also for her great warmth and kindness and her consideration for her fellow colleagues and for her advice and help, which she gave selflessly. The Group would not be as successful as it is today without Wendy&#039;scontribution. 
 
Like Wendy, John had been a director of the Group since its formation in 2004 and his wealth of experience in the direct marketing industry, wise counsel and friendship will be sorely missed by all of his fellows&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


What I&#039;d forgotten (or didn&#039;t know) was that Wendy Ruck was Adrian William&#039;s wife. What a shit year for them - and not even £20m of the publics money could fix it. 


&lt;blockquote&gt;Wendy Williams (nee Ruck)

Published in the Hereford Times on 12 May 11

WILLIAMS (nee Ruck). Wendy Passed away suddenly on April 15, in Tijuana, Mexico. Loving wife of Adrian, mother to Charis and Darcy. Will be sadly missed and lovingly remembered by Family and many Friends. Funeral Service at Walford Church on Friday, May 13, at 11 a.m., followed by Interment in Churchyard. Flowers or donations, to Walford Church. All enquiries to Abbotsfield Funeral Directors. 01531 636666.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also readers might be interested to read:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Wendy Ruck and John Gommes</p>
<p>It was with great sadness that during the period executive director, Wendy Ruck, and non-executive director, John Gommes, both passed away. Both Wendy and John had made huge contributions to the development and success of the Group and will be sorely missed.</p>
<p>Wendy Ruck passed away suddenly in April 2011. Wendy was a director of the Group since its formation in 2004. She was responsible for recruitment and training for the Group as well as directing prize fulfilment operations in Ross on Wye. She was incredibly well liked and respected by all who knew and met her and she will be remembered not only for her professionalism, but also for her great warmth and kindness and her consideration for her fellow colleagues and for her advice and help, which she gave selflessly. The Group would not be as successful as it is today without Wendy&#8217;scontribution. </p>
<p>Like Wendy, John had been a director of the Group since its formation in 2004 and his wealth of experience in the direct marketing industry, wise counsel and friendship will be sorely missed by all of his fellows&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What I&#8217;d forgotten (or didn&#8217;t know) was that Wendy Ruck was Adrian William&#8217;s wife. What a shit year for them &#8211; and not even £20m of the publics money could fix it. </p>
<blockquote><p>Wendy Williams (nee Ruck)</p>
<p>Published in the Hereford Times on 12 May 11</p>
<p>WILLIAMS (nee Ruck). Wendy Passed away suddenly on April 15, in Tijuana, Mexico. Loving wife of Adrian, mother to Charis and Darcy. Will be sadly missed and lovingly remembered by Family and many Friends. Funeral Service at Walford Church on Friday, May 13, at 11 a.m., followed by Interment in Churchyard. Flowers or donations, to Walford Church. All enquiries to Abbotsfield Funeral Directors. 01531 636666.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community Awards Register: Scam or not? by Sam Deeks</title>
		<link>http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/community-awards-register-scam/#comment-9089</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Deeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mukaumedia.co.uk/?p=3002#comment-9089</guid>
		<description>Stevel - thanks for this information. 

What stands out for me is not only the news that Adrian Williams has personally taken £20m of the British public&#039;s money from these disgraceful &#039;promotions&#039; but also that the OFT ruling has had SOME impact on the fortunes of his group of companies. 


&lt;blockquote&gt;
 Continued cash management resulting in robust balance sheet with net cash surplus of £0.28 million (2010: net debt £2.54 million);
 Significantly reduced turnover and materially lower EBITDA and profit after tax for the period due to the impact of OFT action on Group promotion activity;
 Turnover down 38 per cent. to £8.40 million (2010: £13.45 million);
 Group EBITDA down 82 per cent. to £0.58 million (2010: £3.18 million);
 Profit before tax down 86 per cent. to £0.41 million (2010: £2.98 million);
 Earnings per share down 77 per cent. to 0.30 pence (2010: 1.32 pence);
 One of the UK’s largest owners and providers of consumer lifestyle data to the direct marketing industry underpinned by extensive multi-media database assets across post, phone, mobile, email and internet;
 Court ruling in OFT case on 17 March 2011 with respect to promotion design materially impacted Group financial 
performance;
 Court ruling in OFT case appealed and referred to the European Court of Justice; and
 Difficult market conditions across all business activities.

DM Chairman, Adrian Williams said: “2011 has, for many reasons, been one of the most challenging periods in the Group’s history, but the Group continues to be well managed and its resilience in these difficult times means that it is still well placed to benefit when market conditions start to improve.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stevel &#8211; thanks for this information. </p>
<p>What stands out for me is not only the news that Adrian Williams has personally taken £20m of the British public&#8217;s money from these disgraceful &#8216;promotions&#8217; but also that the OFT ruling has had SOME impact on the fortunes of his group of companies. </p>
<blockquote><p>
 Continued cash management resulting in robust balance sheet with net cash surplus of £0.28 million (2010: net debt £2.54 million);<br />
 Significantly reduced turnover and materially lower EBITDA and profit after tax for the period due to the impact of OFT action on Group promotion activity;<br />
 Turnover down 38 per cent. to £8.40 million (2010: £13.45 million);<br />
 Group EBITDA down 82 per cent. to £0.58 million (2010: £3.18 million);<br />
 Profit before tax down 86 per cent. to £0.41 million (2010: £2.98 million);<br />
 Earnings per share down 77 per cent. to 0.30 pence (2010: 1.32 pence);<br />
 One of the UK’s largest owners and providers of consumer lifestyle data to the direct marketing industry underpinned by extensive multi-media database assets across post, phone, mobile, email and internet;<br />
 Court ruling in OFT case on 17 March 2011 with respect to promotion design materially impacted Group financial<br />
performance;<br />
 Court ruling in OFT case appealed and referred to the European Court of Justice; and<br />
 Difficult market conditions across all business activities.</p>
<p>DM Chairman, Adrian Williams said: “2011 has, for many reasons, been one of the most challenging periods in the Group’s history, but the Group continues to be well managed and its resilience in these difficult times means that it is still well placed to benefit when market conditions start to improve.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

